Remediation courses for Osteopaths facing an Osteopathic Council notification, complaint or investigation

Start with the Core Set above. Those nine cover both halves of what the Council reads: the standards you are judged against — Ethics and Ethical Standards for Osteopaths and Professionalism and Professional Standards for Osteopaths, both written to Code of Conduct for Osteopaths — and what it weighs once the facts are settled: insight, reflection, remediation, assurance the concern will not recur, and how the process itself works. They apply to every notification whatever the concern.

Then add the courses that match the concern actually raised. Use the selector above: choose the type of concern in your letter and you will see the courses that address it directly.

Speak to your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer before you respond. They will tell you what evidence is appropriate for your particular matter. Each course is NZ$200 and carries 2 CPD hours; the Bulk Buy Offer covers any five for NZ$850 or any ten for NZ$1,400, saving up to NZ$600.

The Osteopathic Council. It alone decides whether you hold a practising certificate, what conditions sit on your scope of practice, and whether you are fit to practise. Its Registrar receives every complaint and notification and the Council decides which route it takes: a competence review for competence, the Health Committee for health, or a Professional Conduct Committee for conduct — or an educational letter, or no further action.

A Professional Conduct Committee is appointed by the Council but acts independently of it. It investigates the particular concern referred to it and reports back with recommendations, which may include laying a charge before the Tribunal.

The Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal is the last stage and the only one that can find professional misconduct. Check the letterhead on your letter: it tells you which stage you are at.

Interim suspension is the Council suspending your practising certificate — or adding conditions to your scope of practice — while a competence review, a health assessment or a Professional Conduct Committee investigation is still under way, where it believes there is a risk of serious harm to the public. It is protective rather than punitive and is not a finding against you. In many cases an agreement setting temporary limitations on your practice is reached instead.

You are given the opportunity to respond before an order is made, and the Council can revoke it at any time once satisfied you can practise safely. Contact your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer the same day. What you put in writing first shapes everything that follows.

Yes. Healthcare Ethics Courses issues a CPD certificate for every course, recording 2 CPD hours, the course title and the date of completion. That is what makes it usable as evidence in a response, a remediation plan or a professional development record.

On accreditation: the courses are written to Code of Conduct for Osteopaths and the Council’s capabilities and guidelines beneath it, but are not accredited or endorsed by the Osteopathic Council or any other New Zealand body, and no responsible authority accredits courses from any provider. The Council’s Continuing Competence Programme asks for at least 50 points of CPD — a point being an hour of learning — in every two-year recertification cycle, with at least 10 hours in each year, planned against the Capabilities for Osteopathic Practice and the Code of Conduct, with your reflections on what you learnt documented; peer review is strongly encouraged and a random sample is audited. A course with your own written reflection attached fits that frame; record the hours and keep the reflection with them.

Access runs for twelve months from the date of purchase. You start immediately, work at your own pace, and there is no schedule to keep to within that period.

Finishing a course does not end your access. Once you have completed it and downloaded your certificate you can return to the material as often as you like for the rest of the twelve months, at no further cost.

No. The certificate records the date you completed the course, and that date does not change. Revisiting the material inside your twelve months does not produce a newly dated one.

If you need a certificate carrying a later date — because the Council, an employer or the Tribunal has asked for recent evidence — you buy the course again. Within twelve months of your original purchase a repeat is half price; after twelve months it is the full NZ$200.

No. No course, from us or from anyone else, determines the outcome of a notification, a competence review, a Professional Conduct Committee investigation or a Tribunal hearing, and any provider suggesting otherwise is worth treating with caution.

What a course can do is help you build the insight and reflection your response needs, and give you a dated, verifiable certificate to evidence it. How much weight that carries depends on the circumstances of the individual case.

Four things, and the order matters. Whether you understand what went wrong. Whether you accept responsibility for your part in it. Whether you recognise the effect it had — on the patient and their whānau, on colleagues, and on public confidence in the profession. And whether you can show meaningful change as a result.

Many responses supply the first and the last and leave out the middle two. That is a common shape of a finding that insight is lacking. The Insight, Reflection and Remediation courses address each in turn.

Orders of that kind are common: the Council may require a course as part of a recertification programme or as a condition on your practising certificate, and the Tribunal regularly orders an osteopath to complete a course in professional ethics or professional boundaries. Our Ethics, Professionalism, Professional Boundaries and Ethical Boundaries courses are written for that purpose and each issues a dated certificate.

Whether a particular course satisfies a particular order is for the body that made it. Read the wording of the order with your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer, and where it requires approval in advance, seek that approval before you enrol.

Yes. There is no registration check and no requirement to hold a current practising certificate. The courses are taken as often by osteopaths who are suspended, who have conditions on their scope of practice, or who are working towards a new practising certificate as they are by those with a live notification.

If conditions require you to complete specific education, check the wording with your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer before choosing, so that what you complete matches what was ordered.

The Code of Conduct for Osteopaths: maintain a professional boundary between yourself and the health consumer, their whānau and other people nominated by them, and do not engage in sexual or intimate behaviour or relationships with anyone in your care or close to them. The Code also treats conduct online — discussing colleagues or patients on social media — as a professional matter. Osteopathy involves touch, undressing and repeated visits, which is why the Council states the boundary so plainly.

What every boundary standard has in common is where it puts the responsibility. Maintaining the boundary is the osteopath’s job, not the patient’s, and the imbalance of power is treated as a permanent feature of the relationship rather than something that ends at the door. Boundary matters are a common route to a charge of professional misconduct against an osteopath before the Tribunal.

Contact your indemnity provider, professional association or lawyer before responding to an allegation in this category, and before contacting the patient or anyone connected with them.

No. A concern that a mental or physical condition may affect your ability to practise safely goes to the Council’s Health Committee. You may be required to have a medical examination, which the Council pays for, and the committee may include conditions in your scope of practice or suspend your practising certificate while you are unable to practise; where the concern is urgent, suspension may occur without notice until the assessment is completed. It is a health process, not a conduct one. Employers and health practitioners are required to notify the Council in this situation, and you are required to notify the Council yourself.

What the Council still wants to see is insight into how the condition affected your practice and what you have put in place. The Insight and Reflection courses are as relevant here as in a conduct matter.

The Council’s own description: the committee’s investigator gathers statements and clinical notes over a day or two of interviews; you receive everything gathered beforehand; the committee meets near where the events occurred, usually for about two hours, and records the meeting; the complainant and you are heard separately, each responding to what has been gathered; you may bring a lawyer or a professional support person and may ask for an adjournment if something new is raised. Within 14 days of finishing, the committee sends its recommendations or determination in writing to the Registrar, to you and to the complainant.

What you say at that meeting about insight, reflection and what you have already changed is weighed directly. The Dealing with a Complaint or Investigation course explains the meeting; the Core Set gives you something concrete to say.

Yes, and often particularly so. Osteopaths who trained overseas are sometimes navigating an unfamiliar regulatory system at the same time as responding to a concern, and the vocabulary differs from what they learnt — practising certificate rather than licence, scope of practice rather than registration category, a competence review against the Council’s capabilities rather than a fitness to practise panel, and a Council that handles competence, health and conduct through three different routes.

The courses are written to the Council’s Code of Conduct for Osteopaths and its Capabilities for Osteopathic Practice, and explain the process in New Zealand terms.

Yes. Courses are taken privately online at your own pace. We never share participant details with the Osteopathic Council, the Tribunal, an employer, a union or an indemnity provider unless you choose to do so yourself.

Many osteopaths complete a course before deciding whether to include it in a submission at all.