Council or Board notificationCompetence reviewsProfessional Conduct CommitteesRemediation coursesDoctorsNursesMidwivesDentistsPharmacistsAll Health Practitioners
Skip to content

Healthcare Ethics New Zealand

All 18 responsible authorities · Council or Board · Professional Conduct Committees · HPDT

For Every Registered Health Practitioner in New Zealand

Remediation courses for Health Practitioners facing a Council or Board notification, complaint or investigation

  • From a first Council or Board letter through a Professional Conduct Committee to the Tribunal
  • Self-paced online courses — start today, at your own pace
  • Work through insight, reflection and remediation
  • Written to the standards and guidance your Council or Board issues under the HPCA Act
  • 24 courses
  • NZ$200 each
  • 2 CPD hours per course
  • CPD certificate on completion
  • Written to the standards common to every Council and Board
  • Bulk buy: any 5 for NZ$850 · any 10 for NZ$1,400

At a glance

Who it is for
Any health practitioner facing a Council or Board notification, a competence review, a Professional Conduct Committee or the Tribunal — including Chinese medicine practitioners, paramedics, occupational therapists, podiatrists, dietitians, medical radiation technologists, laboratory scientists and psychotherapists
Regulators covered
All 18 responsible authorities under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, their Professional Conduct Committees and the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal
CPD
2 hours per course
Access
Immediate, online, twelve months from purchase
On completion
CPD certificate for your response or portfolio
Price
NZ$200 per course · any 5 for NZ$850 · any 10 for NZ$1,400

Certificate issued by Healthcare Ethics CoursesRemediation courses for regulatory processes.

Choosing your courses

Which courses should you take?

The Core Remediation Set applies to every notification or investigation, whatever the concern. Choose the type of concern named in your letter and you will see the courses that address it directly.

Choose the concern raised

Select the type of concern named in your letter. The Core Set above applies to every notification whatever the concern.

Ethics & Ethical Conduct

If the notification concerns ethical judgement or behaviour, or an allegation of unethical conduct.

Primary recommended courses 15 the 9 Core Set courses apply to every notification — the rest address this concern directly

Further relevant courses 9 related areas that often arise alongside this concern

Professionalism, Conduct & Attitude

If you are facing an allegation of unprofessional behaviour or conduct, or concerns about communication, documentation or attitude towards colleagues or patients.

Primary recommended courses 14 the 9 Core Set courses apply to every notification — the rest address this concern directly

Further relevant courses 10 related areas that often arise alongside this concern

Probity, Honesty and Financial Integrity

If you are dealing with allegations of dishonesty, falsified records, misleading claims, billing or conflicts of interest, or similar investigations.

Primary recommended courses 12 the 9 Core Set courses apply to every notification — the rest address this concern directly

Further relevant courses 12 related areas that often arise alongside this concern

Professional Boundaries: Patients & Colleagues

If the concerns or allegations relate to professional or ethical boundaries with patients or colleagues, sexual misconduct, consent or chaperone issues.

Primary recommended courses 13 the 9 Core Set courses apply to every notification — the rest address this concern directly

Further relevant courses 11 related areas that often arise alongside this concern

Clinical Care, Prescribing and Records

Where the concern is about the care itself — competence, prescribing, documentation or a competence review.

Primary recommended courses 14 the 9 Core Set courses apply to every notification — the rest address this concern directly

Further relevant courses 10 related areas that often arise alongside this concern

Notification, Investigation and Tribunal

If you are dealing with a notification, investigation, Professional Conduct Committee or Tribunal hearing — a competence review, a health process or a conduct referral under the HPCA Act, and what practitioners usually call fitness to practise.

Primary recommended courses 9 the 9 Core Set courses apply to every notification — the rest address this concern directly

Further relevant courses 15 related areas that often arise alongside this concern

The full library

All 24 courses for every health practitioner

Every course is NZ$200, carries 2 CPD hours, and issues a CPD certificate on completion. Access is immediate and runs for twelve months from purchase. Each appears under at least one concern above.

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Insight for Fitness to Practise

Insight is assessed in every Council or Board matter, whatever the allegation. Helps you understand what the Council or Board actually means by the word, shows you how to demonstrate insight rather than assert it, and supports you in putting it in writing before anyone decides anything.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Reflection for Fitness to Practise

Helps you write reflection that holds up to scrutiny from the Council or Board or the Tribunal, analysing what happened rather than describing it. Takes you through structured models and supports you through the feelings that get in the way, which is why many people find this harder than they expect.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Remediation for Fitness to Practise

Supports you in building a remediation plan around the concerns actually raised, rather than assembling a stack of certificates. Shows you how to document what you have changed, and warns you off the pitfalls that make remediation read as box-ticking.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Fitness to Practise for Healthcare Professionals

Walks you through the process you are in: what fitness to practise means, why notifications are made to the Council or Board, what happens at each stage, and what interim conditions, suspension or cancellation would involve. A sensible first course if the letter you received is the first you have heard of any of this.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Dealing with a Complaint or Investigation Professionally

Takes you through being investigated: what the Council or Board and a Professional Conduct Committee expect, in what order, and what is asked of you at each stage. Helps you avoid the defensive responses that make matters worse, and manage the strain of it while you wait.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Ethics for Healthcare Professionals

Helps you understand what your Council’s or Board’s standards of ethical conduct expect of you where the concern is about your judgement, your honesty, or your conduct towards the people in your care. Supports you in handling it openly and writing the reflection your authority or the Tribunal will read.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Professionalism for Healthcare Professionals

Helps you see where conduct, attitude or behaviour towards patients and colleagues fell short of the standards your Council or Board publishes under the Act, and why that matters to it. Supports you in building the insight and reflection that go into a remediation response.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Medical Ethics Course

A longer course for matters where several concerns have been raised at once, or where the allegations are serious. Helps you work through genuinely difficult decisions in clinical practice and supports you in rebuilding trust with the Council or Board.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Professional Ethics Course

For matters where your honesty, integrity or accountability in day-to-day practice has been questioned. Helps you see how these lapses usually happen and what they mean for patients and colleagues, and supports you in responding credibly while an investigation is open.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Duty of Candour for Healthcare Professionals

Being open after something goes wrong is a duty, not a courtesy. Helps you apologise properly without admitting liability, hold the conversation itself, and record it — and explains why a failure of candour is often treated more seriously than the error that prompted it.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Confidentiality in Healthcare Practice

A conversation overheard, records accessed, or something shared that should not have been. Helps you understand when disclosure is lawful and when it is mandatory, covers telehealth and digital records, and supports you in remediating a breach.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Privacy, Consent and Chaperone in Healthcare Practice

Consent is among the common causes of notification. Reminds you what valid consent requires, how it should be recorded, and when a chaperone should be offered, and helps you reflect on an examination that has been questioned.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Effective Communication for Healthcare Professionals

Communication sits behind more complaints than any other single factor. Helps you look again at how you spoke to a patient, a family or a colleague, and supports you in showing the Council or Board what you would do differently.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Documentation for Healthcare Professionals

Record-keeping features in many notifications, and a record amended after a concern is raised turns a clinical matter into one of honesty. Reminds you what accurate, timely notes look like and how an error should be corrected.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Ensuring Teamwork and Collaboration

For concerns that involve colleagues rather than patients — conflict, handover, delegation, or how you behave within a team. Helps you understand what went wrong and supports you in evidencing changed working relationships to the Council or Board.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Ensuring Clinical Competence and Patient Safety

For concerns about your clinical judgement, knowledge or performance. Helps you work within the limits of your competence, recognise the early signs of declining performance, and show the Council or Board that competence has been restored.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Probity and Honesty for Healthcare Professionals

If your letter uses the word probity, start here. Helps you understand what honesty and integrity mean in records, declarations and billing, and supports you in rebuilding trust through a documented remediation plan.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Financial Integrity for Healthcare Professionals

For matters involving money — billing, ACC claims, fee transparency, or an interest you did not declare. Helps you understand how these matters arise and what they mean for your registration, and supports you in responding to an ACC audit or a notification.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Professional Boundaries Course

Boundary matters are among the most serious the Council or Board investigates. Helps you see where the lines sit and how they are crossed gradually, often without intent, and supports you in putting credible remediation together.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

NZ$2002 CPD hours

Ethical Boundaries with Patients and Colleagues

For a relationship that became too close, contact outside work, or gifts. Reminds you of the warning signs and the power imbalance that makes these matters so serious, and helps you show insight and accountability afterwards.

Council and Board standards Add to basket

Written for you

Every other health practitioner

The 24 courses above are written to the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 and the standards of ethical conduct common to every Council and Board. Every responsible authority handles competence, health and conduct through the same three routes, refers conduct to a Professional Conduct Committee, and lays any charge before the same Tribunal — so whichever of these authorities holds, or held, your registration, the Core Set and the concern groups above apply to you. There is no registration check: the courses are taken as readily by practitioners whose practising certificate is suspended or cancelled, or who are working towards registration or a new practising certificate, as by those with a live notification.

Chinese Medicine Council of New ZealandCourses for Chinese Medicine Practitioners and AcupuncturistsEthics, conduct, probity and professional boundaries under the Council’s Standards of Professional Conduct (April 2023) and its standards of clinical competence — with insight, reflection and remediation for a Council notification, competence review or Professional Conduct Committee.Paramedic CouncilCourses for ParamedicsEthics, conduct, probity and professional boundaries under the Council’s standards of ethical conduct — with insight, reflection and remediation for a notification, competence review or Professional Conduct Committee.Occupational Therapy BoardCourses for Occupational TherapistsEthics, conduct, probity and professional boundaries under the Board’s code of ethics and competencies — with insight, reflection and remediation for a notification, competence review or Professional Conduct Committee.Podiatrists BoardCourses for PodiatristsEthics, conduct, probity and professional boundaries under the Board’s standards of ethical conduct — with insight, reflection and remediation for a notification, competence review or Professional Conduct Committee.Dietitians BoardCourses for DietitiansEthics, conduct, probity and professional boundaries under the Board’s code of ethics and conduct — with insight, reflection and remediation for a notification, competence review or Professional Conduct Committee.Medical Radiation Technologists BoardCourses for Medical Radiation TechnologistsEthics, conduct, probity and professional boundaries under the Board’s code of ethics and conduct — with insight, reflection and remediation for a notification, competence review or Professional Conduct Committee.Medical Sciences CouncilCourses for Medical Laboratory Scientists and Anaesthetic TechniciansEthics, conduct, probity and professional boundaries under the Council’s standards of ethical conduct — with insight, reflection and remediation for a notification, competence review or Professional Conduct Committee.Psychotherapists BoardCourses for PsychotherapistsEthics, professional boundaries and conduct under the Board’s standards of ethical conduct — with insight, reflection and remediation for a notification, competence review or Professional Conduct Committee.

Before anything else

Who investigates you — your Council or Board, a Professional Conduct Committee, or the Tribunal?

Your Council or Board runs the competence, health and conduct processes for every health practitioner under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, through the three routes the Act provides to every authority — competence, health and conduct; a committee investigates conduct on its behalf; one national Tribunal hears the charge. Check the letterhead on your letter to see which stage you are at.

Your notification arrives at your Council or Board

Anyone can raise a concern about a registered practitioner in writing — a patient, a colleague, an employer, another health practitioner, ACC or the courts — and the Act requires an employer who dismisses a practitioner, or accepts a resignation, for competence-related reasons to notify (section 34), and anyone who believes a health condition may affect a practitioner’s practice to notify (section 45). Every authority considers it first, through its Registrar or a delegated committee, sorts it into competence, health or conduct, and asks you for a written response. Where there is a risk of serious harm it may impose interim conditions or an interim suspension (sections 39, 48 and 69).

The competence route

Where the concern is that you are practising below the required standard, your authority may review your competence under section 36 against the standards it sets for your scope of practice — by a panel, a committee or independent reviewers, each authority naming its own. Where the standard is not met it may order a competence programme, conditions on your scope of practice, an examination or assessment, or supervision (section 38). Every authority describes this as educative and supportive, not disciplinary.

The health route

Where a mental or physical condition may affect your ability to practise safely, your authority may require a medical examination (section 49) and, through a health committee or its own process, include conditions in your scope of practice or suspend your practising certificate while you are unable to practise (section 50). A health process is not a conduct one.

A Professional Conduct Committee

Where the concern is about your conduct, or you have been convicted of a specified offence, your authority refers it to a Professional Conduct Committee under section 71 — two members of your profession and a layperson, with a legal adviser and, where needed, an investigator — which investigates independently. You respond in writing and, usually, meet the committee. Under section 80 it may recommend that your authority counsel you or review your competence, health or scope of practice, refer the matter to the Police, decide on no further action or conciliation, or lay a charge before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal

The Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal hears a charge laid by a Professional Conduct Committee — a chair who is a lawyer, three members of your profession and a layperson, usually in public. It disciplines for professional misconduct under section 100 — malpractice or negligence in your scope of practice, or conduct that discredits the profession — and its orders run from censure, fines and costs through conditions to suspension and cancellation of registration, with an appeal to the High Court. It regularly orders a practitioner to complete a course in professional ethics or professional boundaries.

What does not change

Wherever your matter sits and whichever authority holds it, what is asked of you is the same: insight into what happened, reflection set down in your own words, and remediation you can evidence. That is what the Core Remediation Set above is built around.

In short

What are Council or Board remediation courses for every health practitioner?

Council or Board remediation courses are self-paced online courses taken by a health practitioner registered in New Zealand to evidence insight, reflection and remediation in response to a notification to your Council or Board, a competence review, a Professional Conduct Committee, or a charge before the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal. They are not a Council or Board product, and the Council or Board does not approve, accredit or endorse any provider’s courses. What they give you is independent, dated evidence that you identified the concern and acted on it — and when.

This page carries 24 such courses written for every health practitioner, NZ$200 each, any five for NZ$850 or any ten for NZ$1,400, saving up to NZ$600. They are written to your authority’s standards of ethical conduct — the standards each of the 18 responsible authorities publishes under section 118(i) of the Act — and the standards and guidelines your authority publishes beneath it. Nine form a Core Set that applies to any notification, whatever the concern; the remaining fifteen are grouped by the type of concern raised. Every course carries 2 CPD hours and issues a CPD certificate from Healthcare Ethics Courses on completion, recording the course title, the hours and the date.

No course decides a notification, and no provider can promise an outcome. What matters is who reads the evidence, and when. The Council or Board is answering a question about risk rather than punishment — is this likely to happen again? If a matter goes to the Tribunal, it reads the same file cold, months later, without having met you. Remediation completed while a matter is open reads as engagement; the identical material assembled just before a decision reads as compliance.

Council or Board notifications

Supporting every health practitioner through a Council or Board investigation

Courses
24, written for every health practitioner in New Zealand
Price
NZ$200 per course · any five for NZ$850 · any ten for NZ$1,400 (ten for the price of seven)
CPD per course
2 hours
Core Set
9 courses, 18 CPD hours
Written to
The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 and the standards of ethical conduct each Council and Board publishes under it
Certificate
Issued by Healthcare Ethics Courses on completion
Bodies covered
All 18 responsible authorities, their competence, health and conduct processes, Professional Conduct Committees and the Tribunal
Format
Online, self-paced, immediate access
Access
Twelve months from purchase, with unlimited revisiting

A notification to the Responsible authorities under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, and the investigation that follows it, is one of the hardest things a health practitioner deals with, and it rarely arrives at a convenient moment. Whether the concern is about conduct, competence or health, and whether it came from a patient, a colleague, an employer or a mandatory notification made about you, the question the Council or Board is answering is the same one: is the public at risk, and is this likely to happen again? Demonstrating active, documented remediation is one of the few parts of that process still within your control while everything else waits.

These courses are written for every health practitioner responding to concerns raised with the Council or Board under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, and for those referred on to a competence review, a health process, a Professional Conduct Committee or the Tribunal. Every course is written to your authority’s standards of ethical conduct and the standards and guidelines your authority publishes beneath it — on professional boundaries, informed consent, records, honesty with patients and third-party payers, openness when something has gone wrong, privacy and confidentiality, conduct online and cultural safety. Structured study, written reflection and demonstrable change are what the Council or Board — and later, if it comes to it, the Tribunal — treats as evidence of insight rather than assertion of it.

Every course issues a CPD certificate from Healthcare Ethics Courses on completion, recording 2 CPD hours, the course title and the date. The courses are written to the Council or Board’s standards but are not accredited or endorsed by your Council or Board or any other New Zealand body, and you should record the course in your recertification record in the way your own programme asks. The certificate is not the evidence on its own: attached to your own written reflection, it belongs in a remediation plan, in a written response to the Council or Board, in a submission to a Professional Conduct Committee, or in evidence filed with the Tribunal.

Why it matters

What your Council or Board is actually assessing

Once the facts are settled, the Council or Board is answering a question about risk rather than punishment: is this likely to happen again?

Four things, and the order matters

Whether you understand what went wrong. Whether you accept responsibility for your part in it. Whether you recognise the effect it had — on the patient and their whānau, on colleagues, and on public confidence in the profession. And whether you can show meaningful change as a result. Many responses supply the first and the last and leave out the middle two.

Disclosure of harm is assessed alongside the clinical facts

What happened clinically is usually the shortest part of the story. What the Council or Board examines — every authority’s standards require openness and honesty when something has gone wrong — is whether you told the patient, whether you escalated at the time, and what has changed since. A response that defends the clinical decision but never reaches those three things answers a question nobody asked.

Records are judged twice

Once as clinical care and once as evidence. Late entries, gaps and retrospective additions are looked at closely against the record-keeping standard your authority publishes. Amending a record after you know a concern has been raised turns a clinical matter into one of honesty, which is a far harder allegation to answer. Never alter an entry once a notification exists.

Beginning concedes nothing

Undertaking remediation is not an admission of anything. It is one of the few parts of this process entirely within your control while everything else waits, and it is equally useful whether you are facing a competence review, a health process, a Professional Conduct Committee, or the Tribunal.

Evidence somebody else can verify

Your own account of your own improvement is the weakest evidence available, and every health practitioner offers it. A dated certificate from an external provider, attached to your own written reflection, is not. Timing matters too: study completed while a matter is open reads as engagement, while the identical material assembled just before a decision reads as compliance.

Written for your Council or Board

Aligned with your authority’s standards of ethical conduct and the standards each Council and Board publishes under section 118(i) of the Act — professional boundaries, informed consent, records, advertising, conduct online — and the competence review, health and Professional Conduct Committee processes the Act gives every authority, and the Tribunal.

Why these courses

Why a certificated course helps in a response to your Council or Board

The Council or Board has told you what is being assessed. These are the six things a course can actually contribute to that, and the limits of each.

Evidence somebody else can verify

Your own account of your own improvement is the weakest evidence available, and every health practitioner offers it. A dated certificate issued by an external provider is not your account — it is a record that exists independently of you, showing what you studied and when you did it.

Immediate access, when timing is the point

Enrol and start the same day. There is nothing to schedule and no cohort to wait for, which matters when you are asked to show prompt action to the Council or Board, to your indemnity insurer, or to an employer running its own process alongside the notification.

Written to your authority’s standards of ethical conduct

A conduct matter is measured against your authority’s standards of ethical conduct and the standards and guidelines your authority publishes beneath it, not against general professional-development material. Each course addresses the standards often cited in notifications about every health practitioner, in the terminology the Council or Board itself uses.

Grouped by the concern actually raised

Read the concern in your letter, choose the matching type above, and the page shows the Core Set alongside the courses that address that concern directly. Study that answers the concern reads very differently from a list of everything available.

A certificate is half of it

A certificate evidences attendance. A certificate together with your own written reflection — what you understood, what you accept, what changed — evidences insight. The courses are built so that the reflection has something specific to attach to.

The kind of study advisers ask for

Indemnity insurers, unions and health law practices routinely advise every health practitioner facing a notification to undertake structured, documented study as part of a remediation plan, and the Council or Board and the Tribunal order it. We are recommended by advisers on that basis, which is not the same as endorsement by any of them, and we do not claim it is.

Who wrote these courses

Author and course facilitator

Dr Shehzad Iqbal, founder and course facilitator at Healthcare Ethics New Zealand

Dr Shehzad Iqbal

Founder and course facilitator, Healthcare Ethics New Zealand

Every course is written and facilitated by Dr Iqbal, who combines clinical practice with formal postgraduate training in healthcare law and ethics. A remediation course has to speak to the clinical reality of how concerns arise and to the regulatory standards against which they are afterwards judged.

He founded Probity & Ethics in the United Kingdom in 2020 and Healthcare Ethics Courses, which issues the certificates, in 2025. More about us.

MBBS · MRCS · MRCGP · Postgraduate Certificate in Healthcare Law and Ethics, University of Dundee

Written and reviewed by Dr Shehzad Iqbal. Last reviewed .

Key terms

What your Council or Board and the Tribunal mean by insight, reflection and remediation

These terms recur throughout the Council or Board’s correspondence. They are not interchangeable, and being clear about which one a letter is asking for makes a practical difference to how you respond.

Notification
The Council or Board’s word for a concern raised about you — by a patient, a colleague, an employer, another health practitioner, ACC or the courts — and the start of a process, not a finding. Every authority considers a notification first through its Registrar or a delegated committee, decides whether it raises competence, health or conduct, and asks you for a written response.
Fitness to practise
In the Act, a health matter: a notice under section 45 that a mental or physical condition may be affecting your ability to practise, dealt with by medical examination, conditions on your scope or interim suspension — separately from competence (section 36) and conduct (a Professional Conduct Committee, section 71), and also the test for registration and a practising certificate (section 16). The UK regulators use the phrase for every kind of concern, which is why many practitioners say “fitness to practise” when they mean any Council or Board investigation; your Council or Board uses it for the health route.
Responsible authority
The Act’s name for the Council or Board that registers your profession, issues your practising certificate, sets your scope of practice and your standards, runs your recertification programme, and acts on concerns about your competence, conduct or health. There are 18: the Medical, Nursing, Midwifery, Dental, Pharmacy, Osteopathic and Chinese Medicine Councils, the Psychologists, Physiotherapy, Chiropractic, Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians, Occupational Therapy, Podiatrists, Psychotherapists, Dietitians and Medical Radiation Technologists Boards, the Medical Sciences Council and the Paramedic Council.
Competence review
The Act’s process (section 36) where an authority believes a practitioner may be practising below the required standard of competence. Each authority names its own reviewers — a panel, a committee or independent reviewers — and measures your practice against the standards it sets for your scope. Its outcomes (section 38) range from no further action to a competence programme, conditions on your scope of practice, an examination or supervision. It is not a disciplinary process, but a Professional Conduct Committee can recommend one.
Professional Conduct Committee
Two members of your profession and a layperson, with a legal adviser, appointed by the Council or Board but acting independently of it, who investigate the particular concern referred to them. You respond in writing and usually meet the committee. It may recommend that the Council or Board review your competence, fitness or scope of practice, counsel you, refer the matter to the Police, or lay a charge before the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal.
Interim suspension and interim conditions
The Council or Board suspending your practising certificate, or adding conditions to your scope of practice, while a matter is still being looked at — where it believes there is a risk of serious harm to the public. The Act allows it pending a competence review (section 39), a health assessment (section 48) or a Professional Conduct Committee investigation (sections 69 and 69A). It is protective, not a finding; you are given the chance to respond first, and an agreement setting temporary limits on your practice is often reached instead.
Professional misconduct
The ground on which the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal disciplines a health practitioner under section 100 of the Act: an act or omission that amounts to malpractice or negligence in your scope of practice, or that has brought or was likely to bring discredit to the profession. A conviction reflecting on fitness to practise, and a breach of conditions, are separate grounds.
Insight
Understanding what went wrong, why it happened, and the effect it had on the patient and their whānau, on colleagues and on public confidence in the profession. Insight is weighed at almost every stage whatever the concern, and it is the element often described as lacking.
Reflection
Setting that understanding down honestly and in your own words, including what you would do differently and what you have already changed. Reflection is the written record of insight, which is why the two are so often confused.
Remediation
The concrete steps taken so the same thing does not happen again — training, supervision, changes to how you work — together with evidence that they happened. Insight without remediation is an account; remediation without insight is a certificate. It is what the Council or Board or the Tribunal orders when it requires a health practitioner to complete a course in professional ethics or professional boundaries.

These descriptions are our summary of how the terms are used in New Zealand regulatory practice. They are not quotations from your Council or Board or the Tribunal, and they are not legal advice. Your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer should advise on your own case.

Questions every health practitioner ask us

Frequently asked questions

Which courses should I take for a Council or Board notification?

Start with the Core Set above. Those nine cover both halves of what the Council or Board reads: the standards you are judged against — Ethics for Healthcare Professionals and Professionalism for Healthcare Professionals, both written to your authority’s standards of ethical conduct — and what it weighs once the facts are settled: insight, reflection, remediation, assurance the concern will not recur, and how the process itself works. They apply to every notification whatever the concern.

Then add the courses that match the concern actually raised. Use the selector above: choose the type of concern in your letter and you will see the courses that address it directly.

Speak to your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer before you respond. They will tell you what evidence is appropriate for your particular matter. Each course is NZ$200 and carries 2 CPD hours; the Bulk Buy Offer covers any five for NZ$850 or any ten for NZ$1,400, saving up to NZ$600.

Who investigates me — the Council or Board, a Professional Conduct Committee, or the Tribunal?

Your Council or Board. It alone decides whether you hold a practising certificate, what conditions sit on your scope of practice, and whether you are fit to practise. Each authority considers a notification first, through its Registrar or a delegated committee, and chooses the route the Act provides: a competence review, its health process, or a Professional Conduct Committee for conduct — or an educational letter, or no further action.

A Professional Conduct Committee is appointed by the Council or Board but acts independently of it. It investigates the particular concern referred to it and reports back with recommendations, which may include laying a charge before the Tribunal.

The Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal is the last stage and the only one that can find professional misconduct. Check the letterhead on your letter: it tells you which stage you are at.

What is interim suspension, and what should I do?

Interim suspension is the Council or Board suspending your practising certificate — or adding conditions to your scope of practice — while a competence review, a health assessment or a Professional Conduct Committee investigation is still under way, where it believes there is a risk of serious harm to the public. It is protective rather than punitive and is not a finding against you. In many cases an agreement setting temporary limitations on your practice is reached instead.

You are given the opportunity to respond before an order is made, and the Council or Board can revoke it at any time once satisfied you can practise safely. Contact your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer the same day. What you put in writing first shapes everything that follows.

Do I get a certificate, and will it count towards my recertification?

Yes. Healthcare Ethics Courses issues a CPD certificate for every course, recording 2 CPD hours, the course title and the date of completion. That is what makes it usable as evidence in a response, a remediation plan or a professional development record.

On accreditation: the courses are written to your authority’s standards of ethical conduct and the standards and guidelines your authority publishes beneath it, but are not accredited or endorsed by your Council or Board or any other New Zealand body, and no responsible authority accredits courses from any provider. Whether the hours count towards your authority’s recertification programme is for that programme to say: some count hours (the Nursing Council, the Physiotherapy Board, the Chiropractic Board, the Osteopathic Council), some ask for a plan, activities and written reflection with no hours (the Dental Council, the Pharmacy Council, the Psychologists Board), and some require Board-accredited activities for particular credits (the ODOB). Check your own programme, and keep the certificate with your own written reflection.

How long do I have access to a course?

Access runs for twelve months from the date of purchase. You start immediately, work at your own pace, and there is no schedule to keep to within that period.

Finishing a course does not end your access. Once you have completed it and downloaded your certificate you can return to the material as often as you like for the rest of the twelve months, at no further cost.

Can I get a certificate with a later date?

No. The certificate records the date you completed the course, and that date does not change. Revisiting the material inside your twelve months does not produce a newly dated one.

If you need a certificate carrying a later date — because the Council or Board, an employer or the Tribunal has asked for recent evidence — you buy the course again. Within twelve months of your original purchase a repeat is half price; after twelve months it is the full NZ$200.

Will completing courses resolve my notification?

No. No course, from us or from anyone else, determines the outcome of a notification, a competence review, a Professional Conduct Committee investigation or a Tribunal hearing, and any provider suggesting otherwise is worth treating with caution.

What a course can do is help you build the insight and reflection your response needs, and give you a dated, verifiable certificate to evidence it. How much weight that carries depends on the circumstances of the individual case.

How do I evidence insight and remediation to your Council or Board?

Four things, and the order matters. Whether you understand what went wrong. Whether you accept responsibility for your part in it. Whether you recognise the effect it had — on the patient and their whānau, on colleagues, and on public confidence in the profession. And whether you can show meaningful change as a result.

Many responses supply the first and the last and leave out the middle two. That is a common shape of a finding that insight is lacking. The Insight, Reflection and Remediation courses address each in turn.

The Council or Board or the Tribunal has ordered me to complete an ethics or professional boundaries course — do these qualify?

Orders of that kind are common: the Council or Board may require a course as part of a recertification programme or as a condition on your practising certificate, and the Tribunal regularly orders a health practitioner to complete a course in professional ethics or professional boundaries. Our Ethics, Professionalism, Professional Boundaries and Ethical Boundaries courses are written for that purpose and each issues a dated certificate.

Whether a particular course satisfies a particular order is for the body that made it. Read the wording of the order with your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer, and where it requires approval in advance, seek that approval before you enrol.

Can I take a course if my practising certificate is suspended or has conditions?

Yes. There is no registration check and no requirement to hold a current practising certificate. The courses are taken as often by every health practitioner who are suspended, who have conditions on their scope of practice, or who are working towards a new practising certificate as they are by those with a live notification.

If conditions require you to complete specific education, check the wording with your indemnity insurer, union or lawyer before choosing, so that what you complete matches what was ordered.

My profession has its own page — should I use it or this one?

Use your own page. Doctors, nurses, midwives, dentists, pharmacists, psychologists, physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, and optometrists and dispensing opticians each have a page written to their own authority’s standards, with its own pair of Ethics and Professionalism courses and its own FAQs; the ten are listed above. The other 22 courses are the same on every page.

This page is for every other registered practitioner: acupuncturists and Chinese medicine practitioners, paramedics, occupational therapists, podiatrists, dietitians, medical radiation technologists, medical laboratory scientists and anaesthetic technicians, and psychotherapists. Its Ethics and Professionalism pair is written to the standards common to every Council and Board.

I am an acupuncturist or Chinese medicine practitioner — are these written for me?

Yes. The Chinese Medicine Council of New Zealand is the newest responsible authority under the Act, and its Standards of Professional Conduct (April 2023) and standards of clinical competence follow the same pattern as every other authority’s: honesty, boundaries, consent, records, and public trust in the profession. The Council handles competence, conduct and health concerns through the same three routes, refers conduct to a Professional Conduct Committee, and can impose interim conditions or suspension.

The courses on this page are written to that common pattern and explain the process in New Zealand terms; the Ethics and Professionalism pair here is the one to take.

The concern is about professional boundaries — what applies?

Your own authority’s standard — every Council and Board publishes one, and the pattern is the same: maintain the boundary with the people in your care and those close to them; a sexual or intimate relationship with a current patient is a boundary violation; gifts, contact outside the care relationship, treating family and conduct online are judged on the same footing.

What every boundary standard has in common is where it puts the responsibility. Maintaining the boundary is the practitioner’s job, not the patient’s, and the imbalance of power is treated as a permanent feature of the relationship rather than something that ends at the door. Boundary matters are a common route to a charge of professional misconduct before the Tribunal.

Contact your indemnity provider, professional body or lawyer before responding to an allegation in this category, and before contacting the patient or anyone connected with them.

The notification is about my health — is that a disciplinary matter?

No. A concern that a mental or physical condition may affect your ability to practise safely goes into your authority’s health process under sections 45 to 50 of the Act — a medical examination where needed, then conditions, monitoring or suspension while you are unable to practise. It is a health process, not a conduct one. Employers and health practitioners are required to notify in this situation, and so are you.

What your authority still wants to see is insight into how the condition affected your practice and what you have put in place. The Insight and Reflection courses are as relevant here as in a conduct matter.

I trained overseas — are these relevant?

Yes, and often particularly so. Practitioners who trained overseas are sometimes navigating an unfamiliar regulatory system at the same time as responding to a concern, and the vocabulary differs from what they learnt — practising certificate rather than licence, scope of practice rather than registration category, a competence review rather than a fitness to practise panel, and an authority that handles competence, health and conduct through three different routes.

The courses are written to the Act and the standards common to every Council and Board, and explain the process in New Zealand terms.

Is what I do confidential?

Yes. Courses are taken privately online at your own pace. We never share participant details with your Council or Board, the Tribunal, an employer, a union or an indemnity provider unless you choose to do so yourself.

Many every health practitioner complete a course before deciding whether to include it in a submission at all.

By profession

Ten professions have a page of their own

If your profession is listed, start with its page: each carries 24 courses written to that Council’s or Board’s own standards, with its own Ethics and Professionalism pair and its own FAQs.

Courses added go straight to your basket Basket 0 Total NZ$0 View basket
CPD CoursesBulk Buy Offer5 or 10 Courses fromNZ$850